← This issue4 min read

On Set — Top Gun

The $25,000 Sunset

Tony Scott got Top Gun’s gleam by chasing real light on real carriers, right up to the point where he paid to turn one around.

By the Spotto editors

Top Gun

Photograph: Top Gun — via American Cinematheque (americancinematheque.com)

By the time the light went, the deck had become a furnace. Jets were slamming down at roughly 180 miles an hour, the wind was cutting across the carrier at 30 knots, and nobody could hear much of anything except the afterburners. Jeffrey L. Kimball, the film’s cinematographer, remembered the place as a realm of sign language and sensory assault, where “50,000-pound jets slam every 10 seconds onto a football field length of black and white parking lot.” Tony Scott, who liked a picture to look as if it had been lacquered in sun, kept coming back to one problem: he needed the ship, the planes and the sky to line up for a few more minutes.

That is the useful secret of Top Gun. Not the recruiting myth, not the aviators, not even the volleyball. The film’s most persistent bit of sorcery is simpler than that: Scott and Kimball made the U.S. Navy wait for the light. The production had the real thing at its disposal — F-14 Tomcats, A-4 Skyhawks, F-5 Tigers, Miramar, the USS Ranger and USS Enterprise — but authenticity alone does not give you that bruised-gold glow. According to American Cinematographer’s May 1986 set report, Scott and Kimball met each evening with the ship’s navigator to plan the next day around sun position, then built every setup off the available light, using arcs only to extend what nature had already provided. They even shot some deck material at about 28 frames per second to give the pilots a heavier, near-mythic gait. Knights, not commuters.

The schedule was a military jigsaw. Principal photography began on June 26, 1985, in Oceanside before moving through San Diego-area locations, NAS Miramar and the carriers off the Southern California coast. Carrier work was split between the Ranger in May and the Enterprise in July, with airborne sequences running from late June to mid-September, including work at NAS Fallon in Nevada. The producers had wanted the Navy’s cooperation from the start; Don Simpson said as much when he and Jerry Bruckheimer took the project to Washington after buying Ehud Yonay’s California magazine article “Top Guns.” The Navy agreed, on one condition: the movie had to get the culture right. The script was even rejected in an early form because it showed too many accidents. Hollywood was welcome aboard, but not sloppy Hollywood.

“The military hardware was there; the trick was making it feel erotic, unreachable, just beyond ordinary daylight.”

Scott, of course, was not built for tidy obedience. The story that has lasted — because it deserves to — concerns the opening flight-deck material, all backlit vapor and pink afterburners. In later interviews included with the film’s home-video extras and repeated by accounts of the production, Scott explained that when the carrier changed course, he lost the sun angle he wanted for aircraft launching and landing. He asked if the ship could resume its previous route and was told that turning it would cost $25,000. So he wrote the check. It is one of those anecdotes that sounds too perfect until you realize how perfectly it explains the movie: Top Gun is what happens when a commercials savant is handed an aircraft carrier and decides the sun works for him.

The useful correction here is that Scott’s extravagance was not mere vanity. Kimball’s account makes clear just how hostile the deck was to ordinary filmmaking. Temperatures on the flight line reached 110 degrees. Dialogue had to be snatched in brief quiet windows at sunup when the deck was being cleaned. Crews lugged heavy equipment up and down narrow stairwells until an admiral, finding his private elevator jammed with movie gear and grips, put a stop to that arrangement. Soundman Bill Kaplan, Kimball said, was often left to gather what he could while the production shot “mostly wild.” If the film feels aggressively physical, that is because the making of it was aggressively physical.

There was risk beyond inconvenience. The film is dedicated to Art Scholl, the renowned aerobatic pilot hired for aerial camera work, who was killed on September 16, 1985, when his camera-equipped Pitts Special crashed into the Pacific about five miles off Encinitas while he was filming for the picture. Contemporary Los Angeles Times coverage reported that Scholl was performing an inverted spin for the movie when the plane went into the sea. Top Gun’s sleek confidence has always carried that shadow in its credits, a reminder that “the real thing” is expensive in ways no production note likes to itemize.

And yet what survives on screen is not burden but seduction. Scott and Kimball took a Navy installation and turned it into an atmosphere: silver bodies shimmering in heat, canopies flashing, deck crew moving through industrial thunder as if in a perfume ad for empire. Kimball said he and Scott wanted “to coax some texture and imagination out of the film,” and that is exactly what they did. The military hardware was there; the trick was making it feel erotic, unreachable, just beyond ordinary daylight. Plenty of films have borrowed the mechanics since. Few have understood that the real production weapon was not the Tomcat. It was five extra minutes before sunset, bought at carrier rates.

From the wardrobe

The film file →

Also in this issue